Forward a contract to Junior and get analysis back in minutes. No new apps, no new interfaces - just email.
Average Response Time
Pages Per Review
Larger Memory than ChatGPT
Our AI contract review service is designed to help you quickly and accurately review contracts using your playbook.
We construct and test custom AI prompts that implement the review process reflected in your playbook, contracting guidelines or standard form contracts.
Within one-week, we set up a dedicated email inbox that can receive contracts via email and process the contracts according to the playbook review.
When you send a contract to the AI's email inbox, the AI takes a first pass at highlighting risks and emails the results back to you. Each result is supported with links to the underlying contract, facilitating final human review.
Playbooks can be easily updated to match evolving contract requirements.
AI-powered contract review that follows your playbook, saving time without sacrificing quality.
Automatically review and summarize counterparty changes relative to your standard forms, with hyperlinks to key changes.
All responses are supported with direct citations from the contracts being reviewed, ensuring accuracy and traceability.
Our tool aligns with your specific playbooks, including auction draft purchase agreements and more.
Your data security is our top priority. We employ industry-standard encryption and data handling practices.
You're a busy legal professional who works, lives and breathes on email.
No need to learn complicated
new dashboards and user-interfaces, that take you away from where your business really happens.
Work with Junior entirely from your inbox, at work or on the go.
Simply forward any contract to junior@usejunior.com
Get immediate confirmation that Junior is reviewing your document
Get detailed analysis with clickable citations in minutes
Junior automatically analyzes contracts against term sheets, identifying discrepancies and providing detailed explanations with clickable citations.
| # | Term Sheet Provision | Score | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Acquiring Entity: Beta Holdings III, Inc. ("Acquisition Sub") will acquire the Company.
|
1 |
Discrepancy in acquiring entity name:
Contract shows "Beta Holdings II, Inc." while term sheet shows "Beta Holdings III, Inc."
Citation: Agreement preamble. This is a substantial discrepancy and requires correction. |
| 2 |
Directors' and Officers' Indemnification: Parent will provide indemnification and insurance for Company directors for omissions prior to closing.
|
2 |
The contract expands the scope of covered individuals:
"All rights to exculpation and indemnification...in favor of the current or former directors, officers and employees..."
Citation: Section 6.6(a). While the contract addresses core components, it includes officers and employees beyond the term sheet's director-only scope. |
| 3 |
Corporate Structure: Acme Corp. ("Company") is a Delaware corporation.
|
3 |
The contract correctly identifies the corporate structure:
"Acme Corp., a Delaware corporation (the 'Company')"
Citation: Agreement preamble. The term sheet also correctly identifies Acme Corp. as a Delaware corporation. |
Junior analyzes redlines between contract versions, highlighting key changes and their implications with risk scoring.
| Change Summary | Legal Implications | Risk Score |
|---|---|---|
|
Permitted Investments: Requirement for U.S. Government-backed instruments removed from Section 3(e)
|
Broadens investment scope, increasing risk of loss. Creates ambiguity about suitable investments despite requiring written agreement.
|
7
|
|
Successor Escrow Agent: Entire section on successor appointment (Section 8) deleted
|
Removes critical mechanism for replacing escrow agent. Could create significant issues if original agent becomes unavailable.
|
7
|
|
Escrow Agent Liability: Liability provisions expanded in Section 7(c)
|
Requires court adjudication for gross negligence claims. Excludes consequential damages, reducing potential recovery options.
|
5
|
